Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WEBT (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. A Train^talk 07:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WEBT (disambiguation)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an ordinary, orphan, WP:2DABS page where disambiguation is not required. The primary topic has a hatnote to the only other use. De-PRODed by Patar knight who added a wiktionary reference to a non-English word. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:52, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:2DABS. This is to disambiguate Wikipedia articles, and is not a dictionary, I don't think the link to Wiktionary justifies a dab. Boleyn (talk) 09:06, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 09:47, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 09:47, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 09:47, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Clear-cut example of TWODABS. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:29, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, no longer 2DABs, and even if it was the wiktionary box added something more which gave utility to the DAB. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 14:37, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 2DABs applies to dab pages with two topics, not three. webt is also a German word used three times in the English Wikipedia. Unscintillating (talk) 02:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:19, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No longer 2dabs. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:36, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947^{^{^{( c ) ^(m)}}} 05:01, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious Keep as no longer TWODABS. J 947^{^{^{( c ) ^(m)}}} 18:49, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

True, so why did you relist it seven days ago, and why did User:MBisanz relist it 15 days ago? Unscintillating (talk) 23:16, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some of these AfDs (and application of TWODABS) have been contested recently. J 947^{^{^{( c ) ^(m)}}} 02:40, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.