Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volumography

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 04:53, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Volumography[edit]

Volumography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can find few sources that aren't either commercially related to the concept or Wikipedia database clones, and searches of the term in academic literature actually seem to turn up more references to different technical concepts and theories with the same name, but few if none to this version. Furthermore, the article seems to have been created by an individual involved in creating the concept, at least judging by the username in the article history. /Tpdwkouaa (talk) 04:14, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:39, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 21:45, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 21:46, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 21:47, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. -- Hoary (talk) 22:47, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete From WP:NEO: "Articles on neologisms that have little or no usage in reliable sources are commonly deleted, as these articles are often created in an attempt to use Wikipedia to increase usage of the term." That appears to be the case here. Vexations (talk) 14:40, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.