Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viviana Parraguez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Too minor of a politician with no significant coverage. Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG-- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 07:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Viviana Parraguez[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Town councillor in a small place, fails WP:NPOL Kraxler (talk) 14:01, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 15:59, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 15:59, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:NPOL, non-local coverage is very brief, fails WP:GNG. Vrac (talk) 14:14, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:NPOL, fails WP:GNG. --Keysanger (talk) 15:00, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: article fails to establish why she is notable as politician, lawyer or surfer. −Lappspira (talk) 13:15, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator as subject fails NPOL and relevant general notability guidelines. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 23:12, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above. She's just a former local pol, the equivalent of a county legislator. Also, she fails my standards for lawyers. Bearian (talk) 02:27, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.