Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visa policy of Morocco
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Per ANI can we have a single discussion somewhere? Spartaz Humbug! 04:41, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Visa policy of Morocco[edit]
- Visa policy of Morocco (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete Wikipedia is not a dumping ground for random information and Wikipedia is an encyclopedia while this article is not at all encyclopedic. Basket of Puppies 13:11, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep: as per the other AfDs keeps, proposed deletions and AfD-proposing-user talk pages. There are too much analogous visa-policy-related-AfDs currently and I think if there is a need for a new discussion (as there were such before) it should be on a single page. Alinor (talk) 13:23, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Deleteper WP:NOTTRAVEL and NOM. Such information could be in a single page. The Visa policy in the European Union appears to be well-sourced and more detailed.--NortyNort (Holla) 13:27, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]- If it is to be in another page, then you should propose some merge (where?) and not delete. The fact that some articles are more detailed than others does not mean that we should delete the short ones. Every article could be improve at a later stage. Alinor (talk) 13:32, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I crossed off my vote for the time being. How about: "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visa policy-related"? I agree detail isn't critical, I made additional comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visa policy in the European Union.--NortyNort (Holla) 14:11, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, a centralised discussion sounds great to me. bobrayner (talk) 14:29, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- If I am not mistaking something this Template:AfD_footer_(multiple) should be used for multiple-page-AfD. I will post this to Morocco, Kyrgyzstan, EU and Basket of Puppies discussions. Alinor (talk) 14:34, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, a centralised discussion sounds great to me. bobrayner (talk) 14:29, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I crossed off my vote for the time being. How about: "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visa policy-related"? I agree detail isn't critical, I made additional comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visa policy in the European Union.--NortyNort (Holla) 14:11, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This meta-discussion, relating not to the article at hand but to the deletion discussion processes, is currently occurring in broken form across three AFD discussions. Please take this to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Visa article flood of AFD nominations, where I suggest that we learn from history. Uncle G (talk) 15:05, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- If it is to be in another page, then you should propose some merge (where?) and not delete. The fact that some articles are more detailed than others does not mean that we should delete the short ones. Every article could be improve at a later stage. Alinor (talk) 13:32, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:23, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep for reasons described in previous visa AFD's. scope_creep (talk) 18:50, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.