Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virginia Tech Lacrosse and Soccer Stadium
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Non-admin closure. D.M.N. (talk) 20:33, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Virginia Tech Lacrosse and Soccer Stadium[edit]
- Virginia Tech Lacrosse and Soccer Stadium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable college stadium of no great size, no importance/notability asserted. Brianyoumans (talk) 19:54, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - It's the home pitch of a D1 soccer team. That's notable. matt91486 (talk) 19:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - If all stadiums located in this template are notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia, then this article on the same subject matter should be. The only red-link in that template should probably be created as an article. D.M.N. (talk) 20:51, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Home of a D1 team, that means it is a notable stadium. -Djsasso (talk) 00:45, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Being the venue of the Virginia Tech D1 soccer team is an assertion of notability. The nom is using a WP:NOTBIGENOUGH argument. --Oakshade (talk) 07:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm less concerned with the size than with the fact that this is a two line article on a venue built only five years ago. There isn't much to say about it. Perhaps a merger to the soccer team article, with a redirect? Brianyoumans (talk) 16:38, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It should really maintain it's own article. Expansion could be done with notable events to happen at the stadium, proper construction history, etc. matt91486 (talk) 16:45, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- A venue could be built five days ago and still be notable. --Oakshade (talk) 17:44, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm less concerned with the size than with the fact that this is a two line article on a venue built only five years ago. There isn't much to say about it. Perhaps a merger to the soccer team article, with a redirect? Brianyoumans (talk) 16:38, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.