Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VintageAirRally

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) f eminist 03:16, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

VintageAirRally[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet the criterion for WP:NOTABILITY, and also seems self-promotional, in a sense... TJH2018 talk 19:16, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for notice. I am not trying to self-promote, rather to create an entry about this annual event that is strictly factual, describing the event. Please advise what steps can be taken to keep this article online! Thanks Jeremyjmartin (talk) 19:28, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:37, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell more about the VintageAirRally, the website only has limited information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.225.75.202 (talk) 16:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:38, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:38, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:38, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Clear notability with sourcing to The Times Daily Mail, and BBC. Thank you to Jeremyjmartin for those references. WP:BEFORE seems to have been skipped, because even a simple Google News search brings back further references from multiple other WP:RS Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:04, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:45, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.