Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinod Singh Chhetri

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. After two relists, a consensus has developed that he passes NPROF. (non-admin closure) Devonian Wombat (talk) 00:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vinod Singh Chhetri[edit]

Vinod Singh Chhetri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG.(NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:11, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:11, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:11, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment could be notable as a president of a learned society, here the Nepal Geological Society. --hroest 16:37, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep As President of the Nepal Geological Society meets WP:NPROF C6. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 08:58, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Given his work, the person seems to have made a significant contribution in the field of geology in Nepal. Though there is no WP:SIGCOV on online media, there must be more coverage on him in his field of expertise. Thus, at this stage WP:AGF could be applied. Also, it is coincidence that Nepal Geological Society was deleted at the same time? nirmal (talk) 09:44, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:10, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 00:44, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.