Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinea summer camp
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn, no delete !votes standing (non-admin closure) Pgallert (talk) 09:55, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vinea summer camp[edit]
- Vinea summer camp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This appears mainly to be an advertising page (some of the most egregious I've deleted already). I declined a speedy deletion based upon the claim of being "the biggest Dutch travel organization for..." However, I am not finding evidence of reliable secondary sources. Perhaps there are some in Dutch; if someone can find them, I'll gladly withdraw the nomination. LadyofShalott 13:28, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. —LadyofShalott 13:32, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —LadyofShalott 13:34, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as advertising and non-notable. I am quite surprised that there are only two Google hits outside of Wikipedia, and one of them is on the toolserver. There may be Dutch dutch sources, but it doesn't seem likely.Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:17, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]- Keep and AGF on the Dutch-language sources. Feel free to withdraw, LadyofShalott. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Look harder, dear Crisco. I dug up three reliable hits and have added them to the article, with tweaks and all. I will grant you immediately that this is not a ton of hits (the Dutch media aren't as wired as the ones in the US), but what they say is reliable enough and establishes notability, in my opinion: they are the oldest such company, and one of the biggest players on the market. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 16:10, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, since someone else has said delete, I can't just withdraw the nom. as promised. However, I do change my opinion to keep per the references found and added by Drmies. LadyofShalott 16:27, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination withdrawn - the next person to happen along please feel free to close this as a speedy keep. LadyofShalott 23:16, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.