Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Villa zografou

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 13:04, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Villa zografou[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Inadequately sourced article about a self-managed social space (commune?) in Athens, Greece. I was only able to find a couple of blog sources of questionable reliability. Fails WP:GNG. - Mr X 18:55, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. - Mr X 18:57, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Inadequate sources, no claim of significance. 331dot (talk) 02:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually there are not many sources in english, but there are plenty of them in greek. The lack of english-language arcticles about this socialcenter makes need of existance of this article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Touksen (talk • contribs) 11:38, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Needs improvement in sourcing, but appears to be well-known in Greece, and has mainstream-media coverage. "Βίλα Ζωγράφου" has 23k Google hits. Here are two semi-recent articles on the long-running controversy over repurposing the space: A 2007 article from Kathimerini, and a 2013 article from To Vima. Most Greek newspaper archives are offline, and my guess is that there would be dozens of articles over the years if someone were to dig for them. --Delirium (talk) 01:30, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete even patiently using Google translate, the web addresses tell the story: mainly blogs and the like. Perhaps there is some buzz about the place, but not in mainstream, reliable sources. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 01:15, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete same opinion as the previous poster above. Solntsa90 (talk) 05:00, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.