Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Kisyombe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus was that the subject may be notable per existing sources, but the article itself needs improvement in sourcing. Future editors wishing to nominate this article for deletion should consider incorporating sources found here and on the talk page first. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 11:23, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria Kisyombe[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Does not have any significant in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Purosinaloense (talk) 09:34, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Purosinaloense (talk) 09:34, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:55, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep I agree that the sources currently cited aren't enough, but I did a quick search and found some (not much, but some) content by CNN, Deutsche Welle and Washington Post, which I've added to the talk page for now. The article needs work, for sure, and maybe some questionable content needs to go, but I think the sources are just about enough to establish notability. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:42, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep tend to agree with DoubleGrazing. There are some book mentions including this one at "Gender and Economic Growth in Tanzania: Creating Opportunities for Women" (published by World Bank) and a chapter at "Women Entrepreneurs: Inspiring Stories from Emerging Economies and Developing Countries" by Routledge. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 19:00, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Geting the award from Clinton, is a sign she is known outside the country, which is indicative of some notability. I will take a look at it in 6 months and see if it still holds. scope_creep^Talk 07:45, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.