Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Very Be Careful
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nontrivial mention in independent reliable soures = notability. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Very Be Careful[edit]
Discussion to run until at least 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- Very Be Careful (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I'm not confident this band meets the WP:MUSIC notability standard. I'd like some input here. Thanks. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 00:09, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unable to find sources asserting notability, seems to fail WP:MUSIC. — neuro(talk) 00:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: no significant 3rd party notability WP:BAND. JamesBurns (talk) 01:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, passes WP:MUSIC#C1 for a review in The Independent ; [1] , an interview in NME; [2], Paste Magazine; [3], The Daily Telegraph; [4]. The Telegraph reference also establishes WP:MUSIC#C7. Passes WP:MUSIC#C12 for appearing live on BBC Radio 2 during a 3 hour show; [5]. Passes WP:MUSIC#C4 for a tour of Europe; [6] as well as various shows in the States; [7]. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 02:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Criterion 12 says: "Has been the subject of a half hour or longer broadcast across a national radio or TV network." I doubt they spent 1/6th of their time on one band. Appearing on a show is different than being the subject of a show. - Mgm|(talk) 12:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, that was was the weaker claim, it was more of making a point that there was a hell of a lot out there with what amounted to 2 minutes searching. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 22:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Criterion 12 says: "Has been the subject of a half hour or longer broadcast across a national radio or TV network." I doubt they spent 1/6th of their time on one band. Appearing on a show is different than being the subject of a show. - Mgm|(talk) 12:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, passes WP:MUSIC#C1 as established by Esradekan. An argument can be made for passing C7, I'm not in the position to determine if C4 is met, but meeting one criterion is enough. - Mgm|(talk) 12:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, doesn't seem to meet WP:MUSIC. The Man Agree?
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:11, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Passes WP:MUSIC#1, as demonstrated above. sparkl!sm hey! 09:15, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.