Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uphold

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 15:24, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Uphold[edit]

Uphold (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reading the article and its history, and looking at the WP:NCORP guidelines, I do not believe this is a notable topic. The company is very new and doesn't have major investors or regulatory approval, and is one of many blockchain related businesses. R2d232h2 (talk) 02:24, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I agree this company is non-notable - it lacks the kind of coverage in reliable sources (and non-crypto related sources) that we would expect. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:27, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays~! Babymissfortune 02:47, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays~! Babymissfortune 02:47, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays~! Babymissfortune 02:48, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.