Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unathi Sonwabile Henama

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unathi Sonwabile Henama[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, WP:NAUTHOR. Article makes no claim of WP:N under WP:NACADEMIC. Sources in article and WP:BEFORE revealed no WP:IS WP:RS containing material that meets WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth. BLP articles should strictly follow WP:SIGCOV, WP:RS, WP:V and WP:N sourcing requirements.

Source assessment table:

"Tourism for South Africa as Xenophobia rises [Grand Angle]"	Interview with subject about another topic. No SIGCOV about subject
"'Give SAA board 100 days with limited scrutiny'"	Two short quotes from the subject , article not about subject
"Cannabis economic lifeline for Eastern Cape beyond pandemic"	Article not about subject, contains no information about subject. Subject is quoted.
"Unathi Sonwabile Henama". Southern & East African Tourism Update	Brief bio on a tourism site subject is associated with
Henama, Unathi. "Uber is coming . . "	Article written by the subject
"Unathi Sonwabile Henama". Southern & East African Tourism Update	Same as previous ref. Brief bio on a tourism site subject is associated with
Henama, Unathi Sonwabile (2013-09-01). "Attracting Indian Outbound Tourists to South Africa: A BRICS Perspective".	Book written by the subject

// Timothy :: talk 21:31, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 21:31, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 21:31, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No claims of notability in the article, my search for references found the same the as nom, minor mentions only. Jeepday (talk) 17:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per nom. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 02:15, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.