Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultra Magnus (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:08, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ultra Magnus[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No SIGCOV, the only sources I could find are from Tformers and content farms. [1] Grandmaster Huon (talk) 15:07, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:14, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Toys. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:40, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural Keep due to questionable motives of nominator and flood of similar nominations leaving no time for anyone to do non-Google research. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 19:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Given the recent developments of the nominator's block, I'll lazily copy from my previous !vote:
Kind of borderline, but there is coverage of him out there. The article may not appropriately reflect that, but the coverage just needs to WP:NEXIST per the Notability test. It's also a bit tricky when it comes to these transformers since there is so much cross-media possibility and so many variations... Does that make it easier or harder to establish notability? Anyway, that's a separate discussion. Here are some examples of coverage:
1. Review from a major Philippine newspaper/outlet that also goes into his history
2. BleedingCool review of a toy
3. His movie death has been covered by a few places regarding what it was and what it might have been by io9/Gizmodo and by Den of Geek among other places.
4. Den of Geek also covered how his toy and character actually came about in the first place.
5. He's also in a CBR list of most powerful autobots. (Yes... a Top X list... that's why it's last here.) --2pou (talk) 21:22, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
My opinions of the sources are unchanged. -2pou (talk) 20:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per arguments presented by 2pou. BOZ (talk) 20:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as he is indeed a very well known character in the transformers franchise. Davidgoodheart (talk) 03:01, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.