Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultimate Championship Wrestling (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Per G4, as article meets this. RickinBaltimore (talk) 00:08, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimate Championship Wrestling[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable professional wrestling company/promotion. No sources or content indicate any major success or significance. ★Trekker (talk) 14:03, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 14:24, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 14:24, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:16, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that the page has been deleted before. If the current page is similar enough to the one that has was deleted in 2007 (seems so as both nominations are for lack of notability) this article should be Speedy Deleted per WP:G4. If that does not apply, the subject is not notable (the only sources included are self-published sources and no WP:BEFORE search results indicate notability and should be deleted. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 16:23, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@KAP03: I put a speedy on it, but it was rejected.★Trekker (talk) 16:29, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete: per G4. Yes the consensus is a decade old but the article is still a load of tripe. DrStrauss talk 18:52, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as per nom and Dr Strauss. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 21:48, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.