Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U with acute (Cyrillic)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Liz Read! Talk! 21:59, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

U with acute (Cyrillic)[edit]

U with acute (Cyrillic) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no such letter in any Cyrillic language. Sources are present but misinterpreted. See also WP:Stress marks in Russian words and its talk page — Mike Novikoff 03:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t nominate this one with an earlier batch because it “was also used in the Karachay-Balkar language.” According to Karachay-Balkar, “In some publications, especially during the Soviet period, the letter у́ or ў is used for the sound IPA: [w].”  —Michael Z. 03:34, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I cross-checked the LOC romanization tables and they have a letter that appears to be u-comma for Karachay-Balkar (and for Karachay language).[1] As far as I can see, there is no precomposed Unicode letter for Cyrillic u-comma, but it can be entered using the combining comma above: у̓, У̓.  —Michael Z. 03:42, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:54, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move to U with comma, since the letter as used in Karachay-Balkar seems to be such. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 00:54, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, remove usage in Slavic languages as the two have different diacritics. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 00:56, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More thoughts on moving the page?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 10:13, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Another deletion debate that got lost do to a botched relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 23:59, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • * Pppery *, I've seen this happen now over a dozen times now, I think it has to do with a glitch in XFDcloser, not with the relister. We're all hitting the same "Relist" button, sometimes the relisting goes as expected, some times the discussion is relisted to the wrong daily log page, some times, the discussion isn't reposted at all. I posted a note about it on the talk page for XFDcloser and it seems to be a known bug. I'm not sure when it will be addressed though. Liz Read! Talk! 05:42, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.