Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USBBY Outstanding International Books List

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 06:29, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

USBBY Outstanding International Books List[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Indiscriminate list of non-notable writings, no claim to significance. Cannot see a category this fits in at CSD Nightfury 10:27, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Nightfury 10:29, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Nightfury 10:29, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into "USBBY," since it lacks any kind of independent notability. -The Gnome (talk) 11:10, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Gets annual coverage in School Library Journal, a WP:RS [1] [2] [3] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barkeep49 (talk • contribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:30, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, "Indiscriminate list of non-notable writings", flippant statement by nominator. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:54, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Beyond the links above there is also substantial coverage of this awards in professionally (librarian) curated lists (e.g. [4] [5] [6]. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 13:55, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:11, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:11, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 04:33, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.