Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UCLA Women's Rugby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:55, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

UCLA Women's Rugby[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG with lack of coverage in WP:Independent sources. PROD was contested, adding a reference from Daily Bruin, UCLA's student newspaper, which is not independent. This is an intramural sports club, generally not receiving coverage like college sports at National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) level. —Bagumba (talk) 02:36, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. —Bagumba (talk) 03:44, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:45, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Club team with no indication of notability or significant independent coverage.204.126.132.231 (talk) 13:55, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:48, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree with the IP editor but I think that there isn't a single reliable source to make a club team notable at all. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 17:17, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to UCLA Bruins#Rugby. Not separately notable, but deserves a mention at the UCLA sports page. If the result here is redirect, I will undertake to carry out the merge. --MelanieN (talk) 15:44, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Without WP:INDY coverage, mention at a redirect seems promotional and not advisable.—Bagumba (talk) 19:54, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 13:56, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.