Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Boronski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:28, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tyler Boronski[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable YouTube personality. No reliable sources, only sources are to own YT channel or one website which solely has a video by the subject - and the focus of that website is the interview subject, not the interviewer. Fails WP:GNG. PGWG (talk) 13:45, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. PGWG (talk) 13:47, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. PGWG (talk) 13:47, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Was about to nominate this myself. Not only is there no third party coverage to meet the WP:GNG, but the main article creator/maintainer is the subject himself, who has not been following the WP:COI guidelines - his version, which I keep removing, is clearly written in a promotional manner, including inclusions of many links that seem to be there only to encourage readers to jump over to his videos/social media. Sergecross73 msg me 14:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. None are supplied in the article, and I can't find any myself for either "Tyler Boronski" or "Tbautos512". Kolbasz (talk) 14:26, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Subject lacks notability and coverage in an reliable sources. The page's only references are to his Youtube channel. Meatsgains (talk) 15:31, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete utterly fails GNG. Lepricavark (talk) 22:23, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.