Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trinity Meadows Race Track

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. —Darkwind (talk) 07:30, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Trinity Meadows Race Track[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable defunct race track. User seems to have taken to writing articles of one line or short paragraph of defunct horse racing tracks in TX. Can't verify opening date even Caffeyw (talk) 07:46, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:13, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:13, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in the expectation that additional information will be added, as with all WP articles. That it is defunct is not relevant--we record historical subjects also. DGG ( talk ) 19:29, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep even without searching, the sources already in the article are more than significant. There is absolutely nothing wrong with creating multiple stub articles of notable topics, be it about places in Texas or anywhere else. Being unable to verify the opening date has nothing to do with notability (actually, it probably is verifiable). I dare the nom to AfD the Tower of David which the opening date is currently unverifiable with the same rationale. --Oakshade (talk) 19:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Concur with the views expressed above. Definitely notable & worthy of a Wikipedia article. Finnegas (talk) 14:54, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.