Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TransGoldfields
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. J04n(talk page) 13:26, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
TransGoldfields[edit]
- TransGoldfields (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
bus companies are not inherently notable. this one fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. it merely has 3 bus routes. trove just says routine government announcements about new buses. nothing indepth in mainstream media. LibStar (talk) 06:32, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. czar · · 07:03, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. czar · · 07:03, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, Seems more of a second website plus Only sources I can find are Business Directories .... -
- →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 10:08, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 23:50, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:12, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.