Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tramaguera

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ceuta. Daniel (talk) 00:40, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tramaguera[edit]

Tramaguera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Small generic beach with no explanation of notability, fails WP:GEOLAND. Prod removed without explanation as usual. Reywas92Talk 19:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Reywas92Talk 19:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect or merge to Ceuta per WP:SIGCOV and WP:CHEAP. It's sourced, and people might be looking for this little (1 km) beach, but not so notable that anyone has written about it in a significant way. Bearian (talk) 16:50, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect: local name for a non-notable short strip of beach. I don't see any reason not to redirect it to Ceuta, but I don't think there is anything to merge. Per GEOLAND, "Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist. This includes mountains, lakes, streams, islands, etc. The number of known sources should be considered to ensure there is enough verifiable content for an encyclopedic article. If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography."  // Timothy :: talk  08:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.