Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Topchubashi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 11:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Topchubashi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and ORGCRIT. There are no sources showing the topic - the family - is notable. Notability is not inherited. Nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject - the family - directly and indepth. // Timothy :: talk 14:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 14:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 14:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete tagged for sources since 2008. –Cupper52^Discuss! 17:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think when it comes to articles about families notability is indeed inherited. We have thousands of articles about families. The notability is related to their members, not to the family as such. Rathfelder (talk) 19:13, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify. I agree with Rathfelder that when it comes to nobility, notability and inheritance are inherently interlinked. The issue here is the continuing unsourced nature of the article. I think it should be draftified, and perhaps that will trigger an interested editor to provide sources. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:09, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.