Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tochukwu Ipere
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. No deletion !votes but insufficient participation. This therefore counts as a PROD deletion and restoration may be permitted on simple request at WP:REFUND. Stifle (talk) 13:35, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Tochukwu Ipere[edit]
- Tochukwu Ipere (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Former BLP PROD. Fails WP:GNG. Although one source has now been added it, like the references listed, appears to be self-published. The article also appears to be an autobiography. roleplayer 18:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:54, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:54, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - article fails to establish notability - article fails WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. Amsaim (talk) 09:17, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:25, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 20:16, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:08, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - When you compare this Afd with another BLP Afd (e.g. Melody Green), then one cannot but feel that something fishy must be going on here. Let's briefly compare these 2 BLP articles: in the case of Melody Green (widow of Keith Green), author of several books,[1][2] a woman who is mentioned all over the internet, of whom scores of reputable newspapers and magazines have written about (thus fulfilling WP:GNG), a woman who has appeared several times on US & international radio & tv stations, the woman who co-wrote the popular Christian hymn "There is a Redeemer" - this very article of Melody Green was suddenly dumped into Afd on 21 November 2010, and exactly 7 (seven) days later on 28 November 2010 an admin deleted the article because 2 (two) editors voiced their *Delete* recommendation. Compare this with the Tochukwu Ipere article, a person who is not known in Nigeria or outside of Nigeria, of whom there are no relevant or reliable sources available, an article which does not establish notability via WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR - this article which ought to have been deleted long ago, has now been relisted twice, thus extending the Afd to 21 (twenty one) days. One wonders why Melody Green's article, a clearly notable person, got deleted within 7 days (with 2 delete recommendations), and this non-notable article continues to waste Wikipedia's server bandwidth for 21 days? Could the admin who is responsible for this relisting, please stop relisting this non-notable article and go ahead and delete the article? Thank you. Amsaim (talk) 18:27, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- ^ Green, Melody; Hazard, David (1989). No Compromise: The Life Story of Keith Green. Harvest House Publishers. ISBN 978-159555-164-1.
- ^ Green, Melody; Green, Keith (2001). Make my life a prayer. Harvest House Publishers. ISBN 9780736909495.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.