Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melody Green
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 11:38, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Melody Green[edit]
- Melody Green (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can buy that she's notable, but this article seems like a hopeless violation of WP:BLP. If someone could rewrite it using reliable sources, that would be great, but in its current state I don't think it's really salvageable through the normal editing process. Roscelese (talk) 23:30, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. —Roscelese (talk) 23:30, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Roscelese (talk) 23:30, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I'm not nearly as sold as Roscelese that the article is unsalvageably written, but I am completely unsold as to her notability. A Google search turns up a blizzard of her own and LDM's promotional websites, as well as this article and numerous Wiki mirrors, blogs and self-insertion music sites, but not a single shred of reliable source otherwise. There is ONE, and only one, Google news hit: a ten year old divorce announcement on "Charisma News Service," a Christian website. No independent, reliable sources proffered, none found. Ravenswing 16:56, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 07:47, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.