Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tissa Gunawardena

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:08, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tissa Gunawardena[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is only a drama teacher at a secondary college. There is no evidence to establish notability. Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:SCHOLAR. Whilst stated that the school dramas he has produced have won awards there is no verifiable evidence that this has actually occurred. The only referenced sources are from a school blog site and a YouTube video that can't be accessed without login verification. 12:14, 11 May 2016 (UTC) Dan arndt (talk) 12:14, 11 May 2016 (UTC) (talk), please give me more time to solve this. because this artist silent character. But he has been many contributions for school drama art. so, enough details does not in online. english news papers as wel. every verified references in almmostly hard copies or vidoes . so do you have any idea solve this. please help me (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:38, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article was previously deleted on 20 April 2015 on the basis of WP:A7. Dan arndt (talk) 12:22, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 12:22, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 12:22, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 12:22, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Doesn't meet WP:ACADEMIC or WP:CREATIVE criteria. OtterAM (talk) 22:37, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Seem to be few independent sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:56, 12 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Delete for lack of sources and credible claim to notability. Agricola44 (talk) 15:17, 12 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Delete for now as everything is still questionable for the needed solid independent notability, nothing convincing yet. SwisterTwister talk 23:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.