Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of recordings with a flanging effect

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Flanging (at least entries with proper sourcing, etc.). ansh666 20:28, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of recordings with a flanging effect[edit]

Timeline of recordings with a flanging effect (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some illustrative examples and a short timeline can be at flanging but creating an exhaustive timeline of a sound effect is trivial and virtually impossible. Note that some of the entries are even accidental flangings put to record: there is virtually no discrimination for this. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 02:23, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 04:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 04:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 04:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The article is in "list of ...." format which is discouraged on Wikipedia. However, there is good sourcing in the article, so I'm not going to recommend deletion.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 06:14, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep well written, good examples. --RAN (talk) 15:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: this article should really be retitled List of recordings with a flanging effect as "timeline" implies the development or change over time. Richard3120 (talk) 17:51, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • REname as just suggested. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:50, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, or if there's anything worth merging, merge to Flanging. The earliest examples are of course noteworthy, the rest are a fairly random and indiscriminate selection from literally thousands of recordings that have used the effect. --Michig (talk) 12:58, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:53, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, or maybe merge with Flanging if there's anything worth merging. WP:LISTN says that a list topic is notable "if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources". I was only able to find one (borderline reliable) source which discusses a set of famous songs which feature flanging (and phasing). I don't think one source is enough to support a stand-alone list. In response to the above comments that the article is well sourced, I don't think any of the sources discuss recordings with flange effects as a group or set. They are all to do with the specific song that is being referenced. Also, many of the references don't even contain the words "flange" or "flanging"! Take [1] and [2], for example, which mention "phasing", but not "flanging". I agree with Richard3120 and Peterkingiron that, if the list is kept, it should at least be renamed from "Timeline..." to "List...", because even the one source I found doesn't present a timeline. Braincricket (talk) 21:24, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:36, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge with Flanging. The information has encyclopedic value, but doesn't warrant its own article.--Rpclod (talk) 01:39, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.