Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Stomach

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No objection to creation if someone really thinks a redirect is useful, but I do not see the utility. Courcelles 04:09, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Stomach[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. could not find evidence of reliable sources covering this venue. [1]. LibStar (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 06:26, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable. Created by single purpose user, seems like COI. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 10:30, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Snow redirect to stomach, surely.—S Marshall T/C 11:20, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to stomach. Not a notable organization, but a viable redirect. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't think "The Stomach" is a useful redir. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Someone unfamiliar with our naming conventions may expect "the" to precede stomach. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:57, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:55, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.