Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Stable

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.-Wafulz (talk) 18:01, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Stable[edit]

Athletic training group. Is this more notable than dozens of similar local groups? — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 21:38, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Does not assert notability. Otherwise a fine article. Wronkiew (talk) 00:13, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A more careful reading of the article revealed that this organization is mentioned in reliable sources, and they do claim several prominent members. Wronkiew (talk) 00:19, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete no significant coverage in multiple reliable 3rd party sources of the subject itself. Article also reads like an advert for their "major developments scheduled for Fall 2008." (which means the article could fall under the blatant advertising section of CSD). Jasynnash2 (talk) 08:40, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Reads like promotional copy. Unless otherwise demonstrably notable in itself, association with a few notable persons does not make the organization an encyclopedic topic. Ningauble (talk) 20:50, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:13, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:14, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I personally think that if this were not a notable article, than the sources would have proved otherwise. They seem legit to me, after reading the sources. jamievanss (talk) 00:19, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

— 68.34.118.47 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:46, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Ningauble. Stifle (talk) 13:05, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.