Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The MacNab-Stark flop
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:30, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The MacNab-Stark flop[edit]
- The MacNab-Stark flop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD, reason was: No assertion of notability of athletic technique; implied lack of verifiability A More Perfect Onion (talk) 21:23, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- No Google hits. Given the article's phrasing, that this method "only works for Iain MacNab-Stark", I suspect that at best this is a vanity article. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 21:25, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as vanity/hoax. I note that the creator, Andy Kilgour (talk · contribs), has made only three edits, all to this article, and two of those were the article's creation and the removal of its PROD. TJRC (talk) 01:56, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:V. noisy jinx huh? 02:49, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, blatant hoax. It might be possible to jump this way, but the rest of the entry is made up nonsense. Hairhorn (talk) 16:27, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.