Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Long Term Effects of Video Games on Children

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 14:46, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Long Term Effects of Video Games on Children[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is pure original research. Could possibly be merged somewhere but I'm not sure where that would be. Nik thestoned 14:19, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, this article is a recreation of Effects of video games on children (original diff), which is now a redirect to Video game controversy. KarikaSlayer (talk) 14:40, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Even if anything were salvageable and not already in Video game controversy, nothing has an in-text citation. Right now this is not notable enough, methinks. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:46, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. — Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 15:45, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. — Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 17:54, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Topic is notable, but already well-covered in Video game controversy.Steve Dufour (talk) 20:11, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article title itself is sufficiently well-formed English that I could see it being useful in search results as a Redirect to Video game controversy. -- stillnotelf is invisible 20:56, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Covered elsewhere and OR, and i feel the exact text would be an unlikely search as a re-direct. Ottawa4ever (talk) 22:03, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) MrKIA11 (talk) 05:14, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Controversial WP:OR, possibly biased; WP:CFORK from video game controversy. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 12:15, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete More like...Long-Term Effects of Original Research on Wikipedia (oh snap!). Yeah, that stuff is bad for Wikipedia long-term (and short). A merger here doesn't seem appropriate given the nature of the current content. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 09:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There's nothing in this article that is useful.Curb Chain (talk) 10:17, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.