Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Legend Star

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 09:01, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Legend Star[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable entertainment complex and amusement park that does not satisfy geographic notability or building notability. No references to establish notability. Already moved into draft space as undersourced and re-created in article space. Naïve Google search shows that the complex exists; we knew that. Search does not turn up any independent mention of the complex. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:38, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:38, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:38, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. BengkelBerkah05 (Talks/Contribs) 06:21, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD: "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." Does not have coverage that meets significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability Article makes no claim that there is historic, social, economic, or architectural importance. There are no sources in the article and WP:BEFORE revealed only advertising, promos, WP:ROUTINE, WP:MILL coverage, and directory style listings. // Timothy :: talk 05:19, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.