Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Great Pottery Throw Down (series 5)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to The Great Pottery Throw Down. (non-admin closure) NotAGenious (talk) 14:01, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Great Pottery Throw Down (series 5)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested draftification. No indication this particular season was notable, and no clear sourcing found. Star Mississippi 03:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Kingdom. Star Mississippi 03:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Draftify - Does not satisfy television notability. There is only one reference, and it is not significant coverage about the show because it is primarily about a person. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:12, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep or as WP:ATD, Merge with main article The Great Pottery Throw Down. Here are some reviews of the fifth season: [1] [2] [3]. Deleting the content would result in a loss of valuable material for the main page, which would have no information related to season 5. --Broc (talk) 11:03, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge a properly sourced summary into the main The Great Pottery Throw Down, season does not have WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. // Timothy :: talk 17:41, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.