Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Freshmen Up at Yale Get No Tail (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:38, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Freshmen Up at Yale Get No Tail[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not finding any meaningful coverage in reliable secondary sources. Does not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NSONG. Cielquiparle (talk) 13:24, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Education, Schools, and Connecticut. Skynxnex (talk) 14:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Sergecross73 msg me 17:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:39, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. I could not find significant coverage about the song "The Freshmen Up at Yale Get No Tail" in my searches for sources. I found lyrics for the song in the 1982 book Poems: Lewd and Lusty and sheet music for the song in the 1971 book Immortalia: Ribald Songs but they do not provide significant coverage. The article cites this source, which may not be reliable. The subject does not meet Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. Cunard (talk) 10:27, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There are no references and after searching for sources it Clearly fails to meet WP:GNG. 1keyhole (talk) 06:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - in agreement with the nominator and previous voters due to lack of reliable sources. (Note: The song survived a previous AfD but that was for purely procedural reasons that had nothing to do with notability, which has been lacking all along.) ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 16:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Uncited with no evidence of notability and SIGCOV. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:27, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.