Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Freak Next Door

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 04:56, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Freak Next Door[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neither The Freak Next Door nor Two Women, One Heart come close to meeting the notability requirements for a film. Almost all sources are from IMDB. The others are from either YouTube, a Facebook page, or a passing mention of them as being shown at a festival. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 16:01, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (talk to me) @ 17:35, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (speak) @ 17:35, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I searched for a while, but found nothing to support an article. Appears to be self-promotion. Grayfell (talk) 01:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is likely that more will be put up about these in the future. It is not self-promotion, I was not involved in the making of these films. AnimationWhiz133 (talk) 2 June 2013 —Preceding undated comment added 20:10, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your ~~declaration~~ explanation toward personal interest in the project. Please read WP:NFF to understand our need that the topic be discussed in independent reliable sources in order to show notability enough for inclusion. Also please study WP:COI to understand Wikipedia's concerns when someone writes about a topic with which they have too personal an interest. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for failing WP:NF. While it might become notable enough for us in the future, at this time it is simply TOO SOON. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for failing WP:NF. I was unable to find material about the films as well - the only source seems to be IMdB.--CaroleHenson (talk) 06:43, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Mark Flood (animator). No need to waste the content. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 21:34, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge sourced material, then redirect. Possible search term. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Still merge, as there is the possibility that Flood will be kept. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:33, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge both to Mark Flood (animator), and redirect; neither film is sufficiently notable (yet) for a standalone article. Delete; merge target is also non-notable at this time. Miniapolis 19:47, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ymblanter (talk) 07:06, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 09:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 08:45, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Merge~~ due to Mark Flood's notability. I just did some research, and there appears to be no independent assessment of the film (any kind of review) for this work of fiction to warrant its own article. Erik (talk | contribs) 19:25, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, Mark's notablity is up for debate as well. Jauersock^dude?/_dude. 19:34, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Shoot, I overlooked the tag there and only saw paragraphs that I assumed were valid content. Have struck out my vote for now; let me review his article then this one. Erik (talk | contribs) 19:49, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of general notability. The filmmaker is not notable either; I have supported deletion at Mark Flood (animator). Can the editors who suggested merging (ChrisGualtieri, Crisco 1492, and Miniapolis) also review the animator's article and see if they still agree about merging? Erik (talk | contribs) 19:57, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, do not merge, as Mark Flood (animator) isn't notable either. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:17, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.