Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Deenway Montessori School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 07:47, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Deenway Montessori School[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOOL / (WP:ORGCRIT), lacks WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV that address the subject directly and in-depth. There is basic, run of the mill, routine, normal, coverage. Sources in the article are not IS RS with SIGCOV. BEFORE revealed nothing with SIGCOV. A nice, perfectly normal school, but not an encyclopedic topic. // Timothy :: talk 02:11, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 02:11, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 02:11, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While the "Oh, it's run of the mill!" argument really doesn't change things, it does look like the sources here are promotional and non-independent. Arsonxists (talk) 04:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:05, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:05, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - another non-notable primary school. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:52, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless a school takes children ages 14-18 it is almost never notable, and nothing about this school indicates and exception to that general rule.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:33, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV. Star7924 (talk) 21:40, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.