Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thalastaanam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 19:29, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thalastaanam[edit]

Thalastaanam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG.

References: One, which is dead.

Article was tagged for verification in 2014 without any significant improvement. Kolma8 (talk) 18:35, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Kolma8 (talk) 18:35, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kolma8 (talk) 18:35, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You have added this reference. Please can you explain how this helps establish notability? Spiderone 08:47, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 20:43, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - clear failure of WP:GNG and WP:NFILM Spiderone 15:16, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The Times of India source states that it was a hit and now has a cult following, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:49, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, as per above, the film has been translated to Telugu and has a cult following. -- Whiteguru (talk) 09:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:45, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above comments. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:37, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This is a cult following and successful film. Majority of the Indian films from the 60/70/80/90s can't fulfil the criteria of the WP:NFILM due to the unavailability of any proper databases to refer. Already this concern is raised at [1]. This is unfortunate to see these good faith articles go just because of the lack of online references. Please STOP these mass AfD. - The9Man (Talk) 06:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.