Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thakur Deepak Singh Kavi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Guerillero | My Talk 06:58, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thakur Deepak Singh Kavi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a seemingly non-notable author. Sources seem to mainly be personal websites (blogspot) and unrelated webpages (uptu). Seeminlgy promotional, probably created because "he is going to start his own [online] publication". Benboy00 (talk) 18:24, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Article contributed by a WP:SPA and since the AfD notice was placed, it has been repeatedly removed by an IP WP:SPA. AllyD (talk) 18:54, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article which features the subject's schooldays and relations with classmates and teachers, all unsourced, usually indicative of autobiography and seldom material which features as important if a subject has actual attained notability. Many of the article's references serve only to confirm the existence of the schools he attended and say nothing about the subject himself; further references are to online published poems and blogs. The linked Hindi Wikipedia biography appears no better sourced. I see no evidence of attained notability though will revise that view if someone identifies relaible published Hindo evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 19:51, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Here is our biographee. This page strongly suggests that he is another of so very many "emerging" talents prematurely included in en-Wikipedia. (He's in hi-Wikipedia too, seemingly with no sources.) Once he has emerged, his notability will be apparent; until then, delete. -- Hoary (talk) 15:04, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Darkwind (talk) 04:17, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable poet. As the above user said, once he gains popularity, the this article could be hold. ///EuroCarGT 04:33, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.