Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teresa de Marco
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:06, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Teresa de Marco[edit]
- Teresa de Marco (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable artist. No independent sources to be found. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:11, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Obvious lack of sources to establish notability. I'd almost say it's CSD-worthy. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 01:59, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete The two references now in the article are written by the artist herself. My search for sources found no evidence that she meets our notability guideline for artists. There is a cardiac surgeon with the same name at the University of California - San Francisco who may be notable. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 17:41, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete nary a source to be found. Entirely non-notable.198.58.162.200 (talk) 07:56, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. A search for sources turns up nothing relevant, as others have said. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:43, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete perhaps it's WP:TOOSOON, but the sources at this point in her career are just not there.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - as per above.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.