Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tempus Nova
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 21:49, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Tempus Nova[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Tempus Nova (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Was looking to de-orphan this article and realized its had notability tags since 2016. I couldn't find any sigcov on a WP:BEFORE, and it's an American company so I probably didn't miss any sources in other languages. BuySomeApples (talk) 21:52, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Software. BuySomeApples (talk) 21:52, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:30, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - I found a Wall Street Journal reference but appears to be more of a routine announcement of an investment. Everything else is business directory listings and brief mentions. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:07, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing++ 20:27, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NCORP no independent sources with any depth. Skynxnex (talk) 21:14, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NCORP also I believe fails WP:SIGCOV. Equine-man (talk) 18:28, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.