Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telepathic Mutant Files

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Obvious hoax. Mkdw ^talk 04:28, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Telepathic Mutant Files[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This looks more like a personal and in-universe page and my searches found nothing to suggest improvement. I suspect this is quite fabricated and has stayed here for awhile. The editor and other IPs have blanked the page and this was probably why or that the author themselves wanted to remove it (as if a personal page). Either way, this is no form a Wikipedia and encyclopedia page. Pinging editors Winner 42, Hullaballoo Wolfowitz, Calamondin12 and Nick Number. SwisterTwister talk 01:58, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both per WP:GNG and WP:TNT. No sources exist to establish notability and there isn't any usage content here. Wish I remembered to PROD back in 2010. Winner 42 Talk to me! 02:06, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a topic made up one day. Esquivalience ^t 02:10, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 09:18, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence that this has ever existed. The subject has changed over the years (early versions [1] featured "David Washington" as the protagonist), which is never a good sign. It might not strictly qualify as a WP:HOAX - the article never asserts this was ever printed in the first place - but it's a WP:MADEUP, in-universe article that isn't encyclopedic. Calamondin12 (talk) 12:07, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nick Number (talk) 13:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's probably someone's fan fiction. Regardless of what it actually is, it's not notable. There are virtually no hits for this search term, which would be extremely odd for a legitimate Marvel property. Even the most obscure superhero teams have extensive fan pages. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:32, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Someone has mistaken Wikipedia for a fan fiction site. JIP | Talk 16:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This could start qualifying as a snow delete. SwisterTwister talk 18:29, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed. If no opposing opinions arise by tomorrow morning I'm tempted to just close this as "snow delete" and delete the article myself. JIP | Talk 19:26, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.