User talk:Calamondin12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Calamondin12! Thank you for your contributions. I am Everymorning and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Everymorning talk 04:16, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Also, just out of curiosity, are you User:66.177.64.39? I'm asking because your edit summaries seem similar to those he used when editing. Everymorning talk 04:17, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, I had been editing for a while (largely things like hoax-hunting, fixing bad ISBNs, finding sources for articles) before starting a regular Wikipedia account a couple of weeks ago. If there's a way to integrate the prior edit history into the new account, I'm not aware of it. Looking forward to continued work on Wikipedia. Calamondin12 (talk) 21:33, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Next time you want to PROD something, google it first. Thank you.--AldNonUcallin?☎ 04:29, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I stumbled upon this article while de-orphaning. I see that you inserted a reference that mentions that he was mayor of New York City in 1673. However, I can't find any other sources to confirm that. I agree that he could be a mayor in New York City, but I can't find anything that mentions him as mayor of New York City. I'm debating on whether I should nominate the article for deletion or not. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:17, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks hoax-hunter[edit]

A bowl of Gulab jamun for you
Here is a bowl of Gulab jamun for you. Gulab jamun is a popular cheese-based dessert, similar to a dumpling, popular in countries of the Indian Subcontinent such as India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal and Bangladesh. 1 more hoax detected. Bodhi stones. Good work!!! Kudos.
Thank you.

Redtigerxyz Talk 13:15, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For more Indian dishes, visit the Kitchen of WikiProject India.

2 hoax pages from 2008 that need to be added[edit]

Check the talk page-they were both closed on afd today! Wgolf (talk) 02:41, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hoaxes to add to the list[edit]

From 2011: Krishnandan Sahay and one from 2014 to add to the less then a year list: The Babysitter Battle (TV series). Wgolf (talk) 21:53, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hoax[edit]

Hi, how do you locate possible hoaxes? Thanks, 1Potato2Potato3Potato4 (talk) 18:51, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Usually, I search under the orphaned articles category (articles that have no inbound links from other Wikipedia articles) and start randomly looking at articles. This category includes tens of thousands of articles, including many that are non-notable and a few outright hoaxes. Because these articles don't have inbound links, few users ever see them, and they can often escape scrutiny indefinitely. Not all hoaxes are orphans (in a few cases, a crafty hoaxer has added a link in another article), but the great majority of hoaxes fall into this classification. Calamondin12 (talk) 22:25, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I simply wanted to thank you for searching and tagging articles recently! I actually removed the tag from My People Will Rise as it seems it existed but still may be obscure. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 23:11, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Doggs[edit]

The Doggs is a hoax I found that lasted for nine years and eight months. Can you add it to the list of hoaxes on Wikipedia please, as suggested here please? TheGGoose (talk) 13:51, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've included it on the list now. I can't archive the actual page (only an administrator can do that) but it is now included among the longest-lived hoaxes. Calamondin12 (talk) 19:57, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks for your help. I discovered some hoaxes or at least possible hoaxes in Wikipedia recently. I found them in Google by searching their template messages, especially "All articles lacking sources" and "All orphaned articles" together with quotations on each template and made sure the searches only goes to Wikipedia "site:en.wikipedia.org". I also added -"external links" because many or most hoax articles don't have any external links section, and legit articles tend to have that section; you can also add other terms to find articles based on certain topics. For example, in addition to the search terms in quotations I explained, I added "tv" to the search and discovered another possible hoax television related. I think you won't find all hoaxes with this method, but it could be easier to find one. TheGGoose (talk) 13:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hoax bands[edit]

Can you add The Rock Gang (2011-2015) and The Meller Band (2014-2015) to the lists of hoaxes please? Apparently, the Meller Band is/was a real band that began about last year, but they tout themselves as a band that started in the 1960s. The article presented the fabrication as facts, not stating that it's actually an homage-type band. Their website has a history page citing the now-deleted article to their claimed five decades of history. TheGGoose (talk) 22:36, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Interview about hoax hunting?[edit]

Hello,

My name is Kim Renfro, and I'm a digital culture reporter for Tech Insider. I'd love to conduct a brief phone interview with you about the Jack Robichaux hoax. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jack_Robichaux) I'm really interested to learn more about your work as a Wikipedia user. My email address is [email protected]. Thank you! Kimrrenfro (talk) 23:01, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Kim[reply]

Hi Calamondin12, I'd appreciate just a few minutes of your time for help with the story I'm writing about this hoax. My office number is (646) 494-4150 and email is [email protected] Thanks!Kimrrenfro (talk) 02:10, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Kim[reply]

See [1] DGG ( talk ) 19:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on the Tech Insider article[edit]

http://www.techinsider.io/wikipedia-longest-running-hoax-2015-10 --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 01:33, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on your work. I saw your edit about Quiller (TV series). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Askaquestion (talkcontribs) 21:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
To Calamondin 12, thank you for investigating the fake article about Jack Robichaux. Axl ¤ [Talk] 12:12, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


I just read a news article on Business Insider. Axl ¤ [Talk] 12:12, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daniel Fedorczuk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marca. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milk Studios. — Sam Sailor 14:29, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hoaxes for archive[edit]

Inventor of a new type of popcorn.
Scottish actor, with refs and picture of other people.
Soviet physicist and inventor. Not entirely clear that this was a hoax, maybe just non-notable. See AfD
Copy of Steven Pinker with the name changed.
Professional basketball player. References and picture are about other people.
Non-existent "short story written by Guy de Maupassant".

They all pass the one-month threshold. I don't think any of them are interesting enough to be worth undeleting to put in the archive, except possibly Mama Mo Yeah. Sniffing around their creators' other edits, I have found some useful tidying-up to do.

With regard to the two false positives, by all means rehabilitate them if you have sources. Neither was deleted by AfD, so you don't need any permission. In fact Maurice Foxell was a PROD, so I can undelete him if you like. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:18, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    • Thanks! I've added the hoaxes (except the uncertain Popov page) to the applicable hoax lists. Can you undelete the Maurice Foxell article? In addition to the Glasgow Herald article from 1960, I'm also finding additional information (books, WorldCat references, etc.) indicating that the subject was both real and notable. It appears the hoax-hunting algorithm mentioned in the academic paper on hoaxes still needs a few adjustments to reduce the likelihood of false positives like this one. Calamondin12 (talk) 18:50, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for restoring the article. I've essentially reconstructed the Maurice Foxell article from the ground up, clearing out the essay-like content and adding relevant information with references. Calamondin12 (talk) 23:21, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two more[edit]

I have examined the other contributions of the author of Tom Prescillo, leading to:

JohnCD (talk) 19:32, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maurice Foxell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Portrait Gallery. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pierre Dupont article[edit]

Nice spot! You may be interested to know that the hoaxer has owned up on Twitter. Blythwood (talk) 20:45, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Calamondin12. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Calamondin12. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Calamondin12. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]