Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telegraph Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 00:12, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Telegraph Records[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct record label which I can only find mentioned in passing or on its own website. Mangoe (talk) 21:55, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:30, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:30, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:30, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – After performing assorted source searches, not finding any coverage at all in reliable sources, let alone significant coverage. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:01, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nomination; article is a stub that lacks sourcing, too.TH1980 (talk) 02:08, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I can't find any reliable sources at all, except for the label's webpage. I can't even find unreliable sources. Non-notable by any definition. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 12:05, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.