Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor F. Brown

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 00:11, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor F. Brown[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:NFOOTY, mostly because I cannot verify any of the claims but also because she appears to have only played for non-league teams and youth squads. I know this because I've been working fruitlessly for the last half-hour on the draft version (I did not realize this article existed) and am having some difficulty. It also doesn't help that "Taylor Brown" is a rather generic name. Recommend deleting this and letting the Draft be worked on until some proper claims of significance (and some proper sourcing!) can be achieved. Primefac (talk) 22:41, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:07, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:07, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:08, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:08, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:09, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:10, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

However much I want more and better coverage of women football, per policy I have to !vote delete per nom. -- KTC (talk) 23:37, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As a feminist who is personally against the Notability criteria I feel your pain. Obviously, as the Notability criteria unfortunately still stands, there's not much we can do about it right now.Taraella (talk) 12:22, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 08:16, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - may meet WP:GNG in the future and article can be re-instated and expanded. Right now, appears to be WP:TOOSOON. WP:NFOOTY only includes two women's leagues last I checked so is really not relevant. Hmlarson (talk) 05:23, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It may not be relevant, but I wanted to point out that the "quick-pass" terms of NFOOTY were not met. If all of the rhetoric given in the references bears fruit over the next few years, I highly suspect the draft will be able to pass GNG. Primefac (talk) 14:36, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator and above. ClubOranje^T 05:12, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Looks like a case of WP:TOOSOON. Fenix down (talk) 09:16, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.