Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tapakapa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 03:23, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tapakapa[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NYOUTUBE and WP:GNG. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:23, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:42, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:42, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:42, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:42, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:42, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:42, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lacks notability per GNG and official guidelines like NENT. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:43, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article only exists to promote its subject. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 01:43, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this promotional monstrosity, which was declined once before but, a week afterwards, moved to article space. Tosi | he/him | ^t/_c 18:23, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An interesting note to the side: before taking this article out of draftspace (unaccepted, may I remind you), the original article creator removed the AfC decline and the respective comments. I don't believe that's allowed? Tosi | he/him | ^t/_c 18:32, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This lacks notable sources. ~GMC ^{{talk to me}} 19:12, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.