Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taaooma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 20:37, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Taaooma[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article for the subject who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of her hence doesn’t satisfy WP:GNG. A before search shows this reliable source but as it is an interview it isn’t independent of her. A before search revealed she won a very non notable award in 2019. This looks like it is toosoon. Also doesn’t satisfy WP:ENT. Celestina007 (talk) 18:31, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 18:31, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 18:31, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 18:31, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Actually the substantive interview article is not just an interview with the subject, but contains an introductory paragraph of commentary. Also the biography of the subject in Africa Media is independent. Taaooma seems to have garnered a fair amount of coverage, "See Who Made Top 25 Under-30 Nigerian Superstars", "Five facts you don’t know about Taaooma", "Nigerian comics fight COVID-19 with gags and slapstick slaps", "Rubbin’ Minds Recap: Taaooma isn’t ruling out working with Maraji and we can’t wait" etc. It may be "too soon" but I would err on keeping the article. --Bejnar (talk) 03:36, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp 💬 14:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:05, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.