Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sylvestre Simon Samb

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 08:11, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sylvestre Simon Samb[edit]

Sylvestre Simon Samb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any reliable sources covering the subject. Even the provided link to his biography page on African Success just says that his biography hasn't been written yet. Per WP:WORLDVIEW, I'd encourage French-speaking editors (and particularly those familiar with Senegalese sources) to find coverage, but in the absence of sources I have to conclude that the subject does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR. signed, Rosguill talk 18:35, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I feel that it is more productive to encourage English-speaking editors from the French Wikipedia ;) Regards, Comte0 (talk) 00:56, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:49, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:50, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:50, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the French article discussion. Comte0 (talk) 00:23, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the French Africa project discussions. Comte0 (talk) 00:35, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, the French WP article has no references. It does contain some links to databases of which libraries hold the subject's books, but if I'm reading this correctly, it seems that these databases claim that very few libraries hold them. signed, Rosguill talk 17:41, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete so few hits come up in searches, and they are so inadequate, that I am confident that there is no notability here.E.M.Gregory (talk) 02:00, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no evidence of notability. Deb (talk) 13:31, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Even his own webpage, which lists some of his works, doesn't claim notability - no awards, etc. Perhaps WP:TOOSOON. Ifnord (talk) 02:01, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.