Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzanne Lachelier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:56, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suzanne Lachelier[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails GNG and ANYBIO, as she is a mere mention in these sources. She was a bit player in a larger drama regarding prisoners at Gitmo. WP:BIO1E applies. Efforts to redirect this have failed. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Law, and Military. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: France, Massachusetts, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- Her work is discussed in Rachel Hajjar (2022). The War in Court: Inside the Long Fight against Torture. University of California. ISBN 0520378938., which I added to the article. This shows her role was of lasting importance given the ongoing coverage in RS. Furthermore, after she retired from the military, according to Hajjar, she continued to defend Guantanamo prisoners, showing that BIO1E isn't applicable. Central and Adams (talk) 19:44, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:57, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Most are trivial mentions of this individual, the USA Today article is barely a few paragraphs long. I can still pull up her name in Gnews, but it's only ever mentioned once in the articles, about some different aspect of the Gitmo detention. I dont' see SIGCOV of this individual. Oaktree b (talk) 16:16, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Oaktree b. Brief mentions are never enough. 103.65.140.93 (talk) 10:57, 2 March 2024 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE. ✗plicit 14:12, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 15:45, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Besides just the lack of widespread coverage, her role or discussion in that book doesn't exactly make up for the subject's reliability simply because her work is only mentioned. A stronger case could be made here if the book dedicated multiple chapters or specifically identified her role as integral. GuardianH (talk) 21:41, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.