Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susannah o'brien

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 21:46, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Susannah o'brien[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:GNG/WP:ANYBIO. Lots of detail without even one good WP:RS, and I'm not seeing the necessary sourcing when I search. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 20:59, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 20:59, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:26, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I had proposed the article for deletion, and my rationale here is the same: O'Brien is the writer/director/producer of a single film produced by the studio of which she is the CEO. (Sounds much like a person with a handicam.) The horror film industry is particularly heavily populated with cottage industry studios. O'Brien's single film is completely non-notable, and her article is sourced entirely to primary sources or her IMDb page. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 23:12, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete simply for now as there's nothing to suggest better and the films are all still in production and let's not even start with the aftermath of notability and coverage from there. SwisterTwister talk 06:51, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - It looks like the article creator also created a duplicate Susannah O'Brien. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 19:54, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The newer article has been nominated under WP:CSD#A10. If this article survives the AFD, it can be moved to the proper title (presuming the newer article has been deleted by then). WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:09, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.