Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sugar Technologists Association of India

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Relisted three times and there's no real level of input nor any agreement. Please feel free to create another discussion at any editor's discretion. Daniel (talk) 03:56, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sugar Technologists Association of India[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't understand how this was created. Clearly fails WP:GNG with the only references being primary sources. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 13:14, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 13:14, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 13:14, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I hardly think that such a 95-year-old national body in the world's largest sugar-producing country is so clearly non-notable. I have cited a couple of independent sources in the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:27, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:51, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I am not sure one way or the other on this. The quote below, leave me very on the fence, on their page http://staionline.org/About_stai.aspx made me go look for the Wikipedia article International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists But it does not exist, but its work is used as references is some articles i.e. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sugarcane_grassy_shoot_disease#cite_note-SCGS_control_methods-21 I lean towards keep, but not strong enough to vote that way. Jeepday (talk) 19:32, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"STAI is the sole representative from India on the council of the International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists (ISSCT), a global association of scientists, technologists, managers, institutions and companies/corporations concerned with the technical advancement of the cane sugar industry and its co-products. The ISSCT has been in existence for 95 years during which it has organized 30 Congresses, usually at 3-year intervals."

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:11, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lettler^{hello • contribs} 18:28, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.